
We are pleased to share that the Center for Internet Security (CIS) has published a security benchmark for OceanBase Enterprise Edition V4. The benchmark went through CIS's full consensus review process — initial draft, expert review by security practitioners across industries, public comment period, and independent publication by CIS — ensuring it meets the same rigor applied to benchmarks for Oracle, SQL Server, and PostgreSQL.
The Center for Internet Security (CIS) is a non-profit cybersecurity organization founded in 2000. It maintains globally recognized security configuration baselines that are developed through open consensus by a community of over 12,000 security professionals.
A CIS Benchmark is a detailed security configuration guide for a specific technology. It tells you exactly how to harden a system, step by step, with each recommendation including the rationale for why it matters, the specific remediation steps to implement it, and an audit procedure to verify compliance.
Importantly, CIS Benchmarks are not pay-to-play certifications. Vendors participate in drafting but do not control the outcome — the final benchmark is independently reviewed and published by CIS, which is why these guides carry weight in regulated environments.
Each recommendation is classified into one of two levels:
CIS Benchmarks are directly referenced by the compliance frameworks that govern regulated industries:
For organizations in finance, healthcare, or government, the question "Does this database have a CIS Benchmark?" is increasingly a qualifying requirement during procurement, not merely a nice-to-have. Security teams need a standardized way to assess configuration posture before a system touches production data. Without an established benchmark, every deployment becomes a custom hardening project that is expensive, error-prone, and difficult to audit consistently.
Beyond compliance, a CIS Benchmark also signals product maturity. It means the global security community has invested time analyzing a product's architecture, identifying its attack surface, and documenting how to defend it. That level of scrutiny only happens for products that have achieved meaningful production adoption. Among the 13 databases currently in the CIS registry, only four are natively distributed relational systems — CockroachDB, YugabyteDB, SingleStore, and OceanBase — which reflects how few distributed databases have reached the level of enterprise adoption where a CIS Benchmark becomes both feasible and necessary.
The CIS Benchmark for OceanBase Enterprise Edition V4 (v1.0.0) provides hardening guidance across the full deployment surface:
For security teams, the benchmark provides a standardized hardening checklist validated by global security experts. Instead of building custom security baselines from scratch or relying solely on vendor documentation, you can reference an independently published guide that your auditors already recognize.
For compliance officers, CIS Benchmark alignment means your OceanBase deployment can demonstrate adherence to a globally recognized security standard. When auditors ask about database configuration posture in the context of PCI DSS, FedRAMP, HIPAA, or ISO 27001, you have a documented and verifiable answer.
For DBAs and platform engineers, the benchmark eliminates guesswork in production hardening. Level 1 recommendations are designed to be applied without breaking functionality, while Level 2 recommendations clearly identify trade-offs so you can make informed decisions rather than discovering issues after deployment.
For procurement and vendor management, the security configuration comparison between OceanBase and other benchmarked databases now stands on equal footing with the same methodology, the same community validation, and the same audit-ready documentation.
Download the benchmark PDF from cisecurity.org/cis-benchmarks (free with registration) and audit each recommendation against your OceanBase deployment. Every item includes the rationale, remediation steps, and an audit procedure, so the document is self-contained. For questions about OceanBase security configuration, visit the OceanBase documentation.
For organizations already running OceanBase in production, we recommend starting with Level 1 recommendations as your baseline hardening checklist, then assessing whether Level 2 recommendations are appropriate for your security requirements.

At the OceanBase DevCon 2024, we introduced the OceanBase 4.3.0 Beta, unveiling a brand new columnar engine. This release achieves near petabyte-scale, real-time analytics in seconds, and enhances the integration of TP and AP capabilities.


OpenClaw's memory degrades over time—an architectural limitation, not a configuration issue. seekdb M0 solves this with cloud-based memory that persists across sessions and shares learned experience across agents.


Under streaming AI workloads, vector databases see high P99 jitter (1.1×–10.3×) under concurrency. seekdb v1.3.0’s fixed delta+snapshot HNSW avoids this, delivering 22× QPS and 19× P99 gains over prior version.
